Skip to main content

Managers Playbook

This playbook helps engineering managers monitor team performance, identify bottlenecks, improve collaboration, and maximize the ROI of AI coding tools.

Quick Start for Managers

1

Get Team Onboarded

Ensure all team members have A24Z installed and configured
2

Set Up Team View

Configure dashboard filters to show team-wide metrics
3

Establish Baselines

Measure current performance for comparison
4

Set Goals

Define team OKRs related to AI tool adoption
5

Monitor and Iterate

Weekly reviews to track progress and identify issues

Key Metrics to Track

1. Team Success Rate

What it is: Average tool success rate across all team members. Why it matters: Indicates overall team proficiency with AI tools. Red flags:
  • Success rate <80%: Training needed
  • Wide variance: Inconsistent practices
  • Declining trend: Tool issues or increasing complexity
Target: >85% team average

2. Team Velocity Impact

What it is: Correlation between AI tool usage and sprint velocity. Why it matters: Quantifies AI tool ROI. How to measure:
  • Compare velocity before/after AI adoption
  • Track story points per sprint
  • Measure time to complete similar tasks
Target: 20-30% velocity increase

3. Adoption Rate

What it is: Percentage of team actively using AI tools. Why it matters: Low adoption = wasted investment. Segments to track:
  • Active daily users
  • Occasional users (weekly)
  • Non-users
Target: >90% active daily usage

4. Tool Usage Distribution

What it is: Which tools are most/least used by the team. Why it matters: Identifies training opportunities and workflow patterns. Actions:
  • Train on underutilized tools
  • Share best practices for popular tools
  • Identify workflow inefficiencies

5. Cost per Developer

What it is: Monthly AI tool costs per team member. Why it matters: Budget management and ROI calculation. Benchmark:
  • Average: $50-200/developer/month
  • Heavy users: $200-500/developer/month
Action: Monitor outliers and optimize

Common Goals and How to Achieve Them

Goal: Increase Team Productivity

1

Baseline Current Performance

Metrics: Sprint velocity, story points completed Action: Record pre-AI tool metrics
2

Identify Top Performers

Filter: Sort by success rate and tool usage Action: Document their practices
3

Share Best Practices

Method: Team workshops, pair programming Focus: Successful prompt patterns, tool selection
4

Measure Improvement

Frequency: Weekly trend analysis Track: Velocity increase, completion rates

Goal: Reduce Onboarding Time

AI tools can accelerate new hire ramp-up: Week 1-2: Learning Phase
  • Monitor: Tool usage frequency
  • Goal: Daily active usage
  • Support: Pair with experienced team members
Week 3-4: Active Usage
  • Monitor: Success rate >70%
  • Goal: Completing tasks independently
  • Support: Review failed executions, provide guidance
Week 5+: Proficiency
  • Monitor: Success rate >85%
  • Goal: Contributing at full speed
  • Measure: Compare to traditional onboarding (typically 3-6 months)
Target: Reduce onboarding from 12 weeks to 6-8 weeks

Goal: Improve Code Quality

Track Quality Metrics:
  • Bug rate in AI-assisted code vs. traditional
  • Code review comments per PR
  • Test coverage
A24Z Correlation:
  • Higher success rates = fewer bugs
  • Proper tool usage = better code structure
  • Team consistency = easier reviews
Actions:
  • Share code quality standards
  • Review AI-generated code patterns
  • Establish team prompt guidelines

Weekly Manager Workflow

Monday: Week Planning (15 minutes)

1. Review last week's metrics
   - Team success rate trend
   - Velocity vs. target
   - Cost per developer

2. Identify focus areas
   - Who needs help?
   - Which practices to share?
   - Any red flags?

3. Set weekly goals
   - Success rate targets
   - Adoption goals
   - Cost optimization

Mid-Week: Check-In (10 minutes)

1. Monitor daily metrics
   - Usage trends
   - Any sudden drops?
   - Cost tracking

2. Address blockers
   - Tool failures
   - Training needs
   - Technical issues

Friday: Retrospective (20 minutes)

1. Review week's performance
   - Did we hit our goals?
   - What worked well?
   - What needs improvement?

2. Plan for next week
   - Adjust targets
   - Schedule training
   - Share learnings

3. Team communication
   - Share wins
   - Recognize top performers
   - Communicate improvements

Team Performance Measurement Framework

DORA Metrics with AI Context

Track how AI tools affect your team’s DORA metrics:

Deployment Frequency

Before AI: 2x per week With AI: 3-4x per week Improvement: 50-100%Track in A24Z:
  • Velocity increase
  • Code generation efficiency
  • Testing time reduction

Lead Time for Changes

Before AI: 3-5 days With AI: 1-2 days Improvement: 40-60%Track in A24Z:
  • Session duration trends
  • First-time success rates
  • Tool usage optimization

Change Failure Rate

Before AI: 15% With AI: 10-12% Improvement: 20-30%Track in A24Z:
  • Code quality metrics
  • Test coverage
  • Review thoroughness

Time to Restore Service

Before AI: 2-4 hours With AI: 30-60 minutes Improvement: 60-75%Track in A24Z:
  • Debugging session efficiency
  • Tool usage during incidents
  • Knowledge sharing

Team Health Indicators

Weekly Team Health Score:
Team Health = (
  (Success Rate Γ— 0.3) +
  (Adoption Rate Γ— 0.2) +
  (Velocity Improvement Γ— 0.3) +
  (Cost Efficiency Γ— 0.1) +
  (Knowledge Sharing Γ— 0.1)
) Γ— 100

Example:
= (0.88 Γ— 0.3) + (0.92 Γ— 0.2) + (0.25 Γ— 0.3) + (0.85 Γ— 0.1) + (0.80 Γ— 0.1)
= 0.264 + 0.184 + 0.075 + 0.085 + 0.080
= 0.688 Γ— 100
= 68.8 (Good)

Scoring:
🟒 Excellent: 80-100
🟑 Good: 60-79
🟠 Fair: 40-59
πŸ”΄ Needs Attention: &lt;40

Leading vs Lagging Indicators

Leading Indicators (Predict Future Performance):
  • Daily active usage rate
  • Prompt library growth
  • Knowledge sharing frequency
  • Training participation
  • Success rate trends
Use these to: Catch issues early and adjust Lagging Indicators (Show Results):
  • Sprint velocity
  • Cost per feature
  • Bug rates
  • Time to market
  • ROI achieved
Use these to: Measure outcomes and report up

Best Practices for Managers

1. Lead by Example

  • Use AI tools yourself
  • Share your own metrics
  • Be transparent about successes and failures

2. Celebrate Progress

  • Recognize improvements in success rates
  • Share team wins in standups
  • Highlight innovative tool usage

3. Provide Support

  • Regular 1-on-1s to discuss AI tool usage
  • Pair struggling developers with high performers
  • Invest in training and workshops

4. Set Clear Expectations

Document team standards:
# Team AI Tool Standards

## Required
- Install A24Z before first sprint
- Maintain &gt;85% success rate
- Attend monthly tool training

## Encouraged
- Share successful prompts in Slack
- Pair program to learn techniques
- Experiment with new tools

## Metrics Review
- Individual metrics reviewed monthly
- Team metrics reviewed weekly
- No punitive measures for learning

5. Foster Experimentation

  • Allocate time for tool exploration
  • Encourage sharing of experiments
  • Don’t penalize failures during learning

Red Flags and Interventions

🚨 Low Team Adoption

Warning: <60% of team using tools daily Root causes:
  • Lack of training
  • Tools not valuable for tasks
  • Technical barriers
Interventions:
  1. Survey team: Why not using?
  2. Provide training sessions
  3. Make adoption easier (automated setup)
  4. Show clear value/ROI

🚨 Declining Success Rates

Warning: Team success rate dropping >10% month-over-month Root causes:
  • Increasing task complexity
  • Tool degradation
  • Knowledge gaps
Interventions:
  1. Analyze failed executions
  2. Provide targeted training
  3. Update prompt templates
  4. Review tool configurations

🚨 High Cost Variance

Warning: Some developers costing 3x+ others Root causes:
  • Inefficient usage patterns
  • Different task types
  • Lack of awareness
Interventions:
  1. Review high-cost sessions
  2. Share optimization techniques
  3. Set budget alerts
  4. Provide cost visibility

🚨 Uneven Performance

Warning: Wide variance in success rates (>30% difference) Root causes:
  • Skill gaps
  • Different work types
  • Inconsistent practices
Interventions:
  1. Pair low/high performers
  2. Standardize practices
  3. Create shared prompt library
  4. Regular knowledge sharing

Measuring ROI

Quantitative Metrics

Productivity:
ROI = (Velocity Increase Γ— Team Size Γ— Avg Salary) / AI Tool Costs

Example:
- 25% velocity increase
- 10 developers
- $150K avg salary
- $1500/month tool costs

ROI = (0.25 Γ— 10 Γ— $150K) / ($1500 Γ— 12)
    = $375K / $18K
    = 20.8x return
Time Savings:
Hours Saved = Avg Task Time Reduction Γ— Tasks per Sprint Γ— Team Size

Example:
- 2 hours saved per task
- 20 tasks per sprint
- 10 developers

Weekly Hours Saved = 2 Γ— 20 Γ— 10 = 400 hours

Qualitative Benefits

  • Reduced onboarding time
  • Higher code quality
  • Better developer satisfaction
  • Faster feature delivery
  • Improved team consistency

Communication Templates

Weekly Team Update

# AI Tools Weekly Update - Week of [Date]

## πŸ“Š Team Metrics
- Success Rate: 89% (↑3% from last week)
- Active Users: 9/10 (90%)
- Total Sessions: 287
- Cost: $1,245 ($124/dev)

## πŸŽ‰ Wins
- Alice hit 95% success rate!
- Team velocity up 15% this sprint
- Zero tool-related blockers

## πŸ“ˆ Focus for Next Week
- Onboard Bob to new refactoring tools
- Share Alice's prompt templates
- Cost optimization workshop Thursday

## πŸ’¬ Share Your Feedback
Reply with your AI tool wins and challenges!

Monthly Management Report

# AI Tools ROI Report - [Month]

## Executive Summary
Our AI tool investment is delivering 18x ROI with 22% velocity increase.

## Key Metrics
- Adoption: 90% (9/10 engineers)
- Success Rate: 87% avg
- Velocity Impact: +22%
- Cost: $1,450/month ($145/dev)

## Business Impact
- 350 hours saved this month
- $52K in productivity gains
- 3 weeks reduced onboarding time

## Challenges & Solutions
- Challenge: Bob struggling with success rate (65%)
  Solution: Paired with Alice, improving

## Next Month Goals
- Reach 90% team success rate
- Reduce cost per dev by 10%
- Train team on advanced features

Team Training Program

Month 1: Foundations

  • Week 1: Installation and setup
  • Week 2: Basic tool usage
  • Week 3: Prompt engineering basics
  • Week 4: Team best practices

Month 2: Advanced Usage

  • Week 1: Advanced prompts
  • Week 2: Tool combinations
  • Week 3: Debugging with AI
  • Week 4: Cost optimization

Month 3: Mastery

  • Week 1: Custom workflows
  • Week 2: Team collaboration patterns
  • Week 3: Performance tuning
  • Week 4: Sharing & documentation

Ongoing: Monthly Workshops

  • Tool updates and new features
  • Team prompt library review
  • Success story sharing
  • Q&A and troubleshooting

Coaching and Development

Individual Coaching Based on Metrics

Profile: Proficient but not adopting fullyMetrics:
  • Success rate: >85%
  • Daily usage: <50%
  • Cost: Low
Coaching Approach:
  • Ask: β€œWhat prevents you from using AI more?”
  • Understand: May prefer traditional methods
  • Action: Show time savings data, encourage gradual increase
  • Goal: Increase usage to 70%+ while maintaining quality
Profile: Enthusiastic but strugglingMetrics:
  • Success rate: <75%
  • Daily usage: >80%
  • Cost: High
Coaching Approach:
  • Ask: β€œWhat challenges are you facing?”
  • Understand: May need prompt engineering help
  • Action: Pair with high performer, share prompt library
  • Goal: Increase success rate to >85%
Profile: Not engaged or facing blockersMetrics:
  • Success rate: <75%
  • Daily usage: <50%
  • Cost: Very low
Coaching Approach:
  • Ask: β€œWhat’s your experience with AI tools?”
  • Understand: May lack confidence or see no value
  • Action: 1-on-1 setup session, quick win projects
  • Goal: Build confidence through small successes
Profile: Power user and potential championMetrics:
  • Success rate: >90%
  • Daily usage: >80%
  • Cost: Optimal
Coaching Approach:
  • Ask: β€œWhat’s working well for you?”
  • Action: Document their practices, make them a champion
  • Goal: Share knowledge with team, mentor others

1-on-1 Discussion Framework

Monthly AI Tool Check-in (10 minutes in 1-on-1):
## AI Tools Check-in - [Name] - [Date]

### Metrics Review (3 min)
- Current success rate: [X]% (vs team avg [Y]%)
- Usage frequency: [X] sessions/week
- Notable trends: [observations]

### Wins & Challenges (4 min)
**What's working well?**
- [Developer shares 1-2 wins]

**What's challenging?**
- [Developer shares 1-2 challenges]

### Action Items (3 min)
**Developer commits to:**
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]

**Manager commits to:**
- [Support action 1]
- [Support action 2]

### Follow-up
- Check-in date: [next 1-on-1]
- Success criteria: [specific goals]

Skill Development Paths

Level 1: Beginner (Weeks 1-4)
  • Focus: Installation and basic usage
  • Success Rate: 70-80%
  • Support: Daily check-ins, pairing
  • Milestone: First successful AI-assisted feature
Level 2: Intermediate (Weeks 5-12)
  • Focus: Prompt optimization, workflow integration
  • Success Rate: 80-85%
  • Support: Weekly reviews, prompt library
  • Milestone: Consistently productive with AI
Level 3: Proficient (Weeks 13-24)
  • Focus: Advanced techniques, team contribution
  • Success Rate: 85-90%
  • Support: Monthly check-ins, sharing knowledge
  • Milestone: Contributing to prompt library
Level 4: Expert (Week 25+)
  • Focus: Innovation, mentoring others
  • Success Rate: 90%+
  • Support: Minimal, self-directed
  • Milestone: Team champion, thought leader

Next Steps